helpneeded wrote:[6/12/2012 10:29:50 PM] Hannah Winters: DO NOT BLOCK ME AS IT WILL RESULT IN YOUR PROFILE BEING MADE PUBLIC.
YOU CAN VIEW YOUR PROFILE HERE NOW http://aao-op.99k.org/xxxx.html WE ARE AAO&OP. (this original page no longer exists, it has been moved to the site listed above)
WE ARE AAO&OP
Sent: 12 Jul 2012 22:11
From: willbeanonymous
To: Wayne
I AM A REPRESENTATIVE OF AAO&OP
IN RELATION TO THE THREAD ON YOUR FORUM ENTITLED BLACKMAIL
THE MEMBER OF OUR TEAM CONCERNED HAS NOW BEEN REMOVED, THE CLONED SITE HAS ALSO BEEN FORCEFULLY REMOVED, THIS PERSON USED THEIR POSITION TO TRY AND OBTAIN MONEY.
WE ARE VERY REAL, WE ARE ANONYMOUS AND WE DO NOT STOP AT ANYTHING TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO TARGET UNDERAGE GIRLS AND BOYS IN CHAT ROOMS FOR THEIR OWN PLEASURE.
THE PERSON WHO HAS POSTED THEIR CONCERNS ON YOUR FORUM WAS IN A CHAT ROOM REQUESTING INDECENT IMAGES AND VIDEO BROADCASTS FROM UNDERAGE GIRLS.
HIS DETAILS WERE MADE PUBLIC AS HE WAS IN FACT GUILTY OF WHAT WE SET OUT TO EXPOSE. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEMAND DOES NOT EXCUSE WHAT HE HAS DONE.
IF HE HAD DONE THIS WITH YOUR DAUGHTER, SISTER, FRIEND OR FAMILY MEMBER WOULD YOU BE HAPPY WITH THAT?
WE WILL NOT STOP OUR ACTIVITIES TARGETING THESE PEOPLE.
WE PLEASANTLY REQUEST THAT YOU REMOVE THE THREAD, AS THOSE WE TARGET WILL NOT BELIEVE THEY WILL FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS SHOULD WE CATCH THEM
ALL THOSE PROFILES RELEASED ARE OF PEOPLE CONFIRMED TO BE OVER THE AGE OF 18 BY OUR NETWORK OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS.
TARGETING THOSE IN CHAT ROOMS IS A NEW AND SMALL PART OF WHAT WE DO. WE ALSO TARGET SITES ON THE DEEPWEB WHO TRADE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND RAPE VIDEOS.
WE ALSO TARGET LARGE ORGANIZED PEDOPHILE RINGS WHO OPERATE BOTH ONLINE & OFFLINE.
WE DELIVER OVER 100 CASES A MONTH TO THE RELEVENT AUTHORITIES WORLDWIDE.
WE ARE PROUD OF WHAT WE DO AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO REGARDLESS OF YOUR FINDINGS BECAUSE YOU WILL CERTAINLY BE CHASING SHADOWS TRYING TO TRACE OUR ORGANIZATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN ANSWER WITHOUT COMPROMIZING OUR ORGANIZATION WE WILL.
Who-is information is hardly reliable, if you think a domain registered is held with real details then you underestimate us and the lengths we go to remain anonymous. I am pretty certain you will have even checked the IP that this account, registered and logged in with on your website. People are free to obtain legal advice that we cannot stop and welcome it if they wish to expose what they have been doing themselves. We as an organization never make demands and never will, nothing we do is illegal. Also to add for them to take legal action they need someone to take action against. All we are is files on the internet.
Yes we use images of girls and boys over 18. However they do knowingly accept them to be underage. So if they are willing to accept those images they are also willing to accept indecent images from real underage, naive, easily influenced minors, common sense prevails on that one. Should any law enforcement agency stumble across their computer there will be plenty of evidence of their activities.
Read through chat logs they all clearly state that they accept the person to be a minor. It is normally within the first few lines of the conversation so people can judge for themselves.
So really the truth of the matter is, the people in question shouldn't be doing what they are doing and they are being exposed for knowingly requesting and accepting images of a boy or girl the believe to be under the lawful age. They also send and broadcast indecent images to someone they knowingly accept to be a minor.
We fully understand your stance with regards to the topic and also appreciate what you hope to achieve with this forum, however may you inform us as to why it has been locked?
Now, as for the person on this forum and his posts, let's take a moment to think about it. The person who was talking to him was a blackmailer. You can't deny that fact. If they were willing to blackmail a person, I have no doubt at all that they'd be willing to make up "facts" about what was or wasn't said during their chat conversations. This is my issue. You can't be 100% sure that what they reported on the person is absolutely true. They could have made anything up, and you have no way to know one way or the other. Are you willing to stand behind the reportings of someone that you have removed from your group for blackmailing a person? When something similar happened on another site I used to admin, every single one of their posts were pulled from public view and treated as contaminated. Again, are you willing to stand behind the postings of someone who has been revealed as a blackmailer using your site as part of their scheme? I locked the thread originally to prevent others from posting in it while we did more checking. I've unlocked it now. The question of the original poster's guilt or innocence is NOT to be discussed there, just the matter of the blackmailer.
WE PLEASANTLY REQUEST THAT YOU REMOVE THE THREAD, AS THOSE WE TARGET WILL NOT BELIEVE THEY WILL FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS SHOULD WE CATCH THEM
Return to Blackmail/Sextortion - www.blackmailscams.com
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests